Difference between revisions of "Short"
(Created page with "<div id="content_view" class="wiki" style="display: block"> =Short= {| class="wiki_table" | Lat: 74.6°S, Long: 7.3°W, Diam: 70 km, Depth: 3.37 km, [/R%C3%BCkl%2073 Rükl...") |
|||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
<br /> | <br /> | ||
==LPOD Articles== | ==LPOD Articles== | ||
| − | [http:// | + | [http://www2.lpod.org/wiki/January_6,_2007 On Top of the World]<br /> <br /> |
==Bibliography== | ==Bibliography== | ||
<br /> | <br /> | ||
Revision as of 20:31, 11 April 2018
Contents
Short
|
Lat: 74.6°S, Long: 7.3°W, Diam: 70 km, Depth: 3.37 km, [/R%C3%BCkl%2073 Rükl: 73] |
Table of Contents
LO-IV-130H Short is regarded as overlaying 71-km diameter Short B, a somewhat vague structure on the lower right. The circular crater on the floor is unnamed.
Images
LPOD Photo Gallery Lunar Orbiter Images Apollo Images
Maps
([/LAC%20zone LAC zone] 137C1) USGS Digital Atlas PDF
Description
Description: Elger
([/IAU%20Directions IAU Directions]) SHORT.--A fine but foreshortened ring-plain of oblong shape, squeezed in between [/Moretus Moretus] and [/Newton Newton]. It is about 30 miles in diameter, and on the S.W., where its border and that of [/Newton Newton] are in common, it rises nearly 17,000 feet above the interior, which includes, according to Neison, a small central hill. Schmidt shows a crater on the N. side of the floor.
Description: Wikipedia
Additional Information
Depth data from [/Kurt%20Fisher%20crater%20depths Kurt Fisher database]
- Westfall, 2000: 3.37 km
- Viscardy, 1985: 5.7 km
- Cherrington, 1969: 4.2 km
Nomenclature
James; Scottish mathematician, optician (1710-1768).
- According to [/Whitaker Whitaker] (p. 218), this name was introduced by [/Schr%C3%B6ter Schröter].
LPOD Articles
Bibliography
James Short in the Sourcebook Project (William R. Corliss)
(articles in which James Short is mentioned)
- In Mysterious Universe, a handbook of astronomical anomalies (1979) :
- Page 138: The Satellite of Venus (T.W.Webb, Nature, 1876).
- Page 142: The Supposed Satellite of Venus (Observatory, 1887).
Note: these strange articles are from the days when a natural satellite in orbit around Venus was still seen as a possibility... (or perhaps not?). Anyway, the observing eyes of lots of professional and amateur astronomers were glued to the eyepieces of their telescopes. Perhaps a bit too much glued, because most of them didn't observe the supposed "natural" satellite (called "Neith"), but... rather the unexpected ghost image of the bright Venus itself, reflected between the lenses of the telescope's eyepiece! (a visual side effect created by poor optics, or...??). - DannyCaes DannyCaes Apr 19, 2015
- We could ask questions about telescopic observers of binary and multiple star systems. Were they really observing binary and multiple stars, or were most of them just adjacent ghost images of singular bright stars? - DannyCaes DannyCaes Apr 19, 2015
This page has been edited 1 times. The last modification was made by - tychocrater tychocrater on Jun 13, 2009 3:24 pm - afx3u2
