Difference between revisions of "LPOD"
(Created page with "<div id="content_view" class="wiki" style="display: block"> ==June 30, 2008== =TUNGUSKA AND THE MOON= LPOD-June30-08.jpg<br /> ''Apollo 15-8936...") |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
[[Image:LPOD-June30-08.jpg|LPOD-June30-08.jpg]]<br /> ''Apollo 15-8936 Panoramic Camera image from [http://www.lpi.usra.edu/lunar/documents/NASA%20SP-362.pdf Apollo Over the Moon: A View from Orbit]. This crater is about 2 km in diameter, rather than 800 m, but has a morphology very similar to a fresh crater formed by the Tunguska projectile. The smooth material on the floor is impact melt.''<br /> <br /> One hundred years ago this morning a massive explosion in the skies over Siberia flattened forests and killed thousands of bears and reindeer. There is still debate over what the projectile was, but the effects on Earth are clear. The atmospheric burst caused a pressure wave that blew over trees for a radius of about 25 kilometers, knocked people to the ground 60 km from ground zero, and created measurable tremors 1000 km away. And yet this was apparently a cosmically small projectile (about 50 m diameter) - the effects were magnified because it was an airburst. If this same projectile had hit the Moon it would have produced a simple crater [http://janus.astro.umd.edu/cgi-bin/astro/impact/impact.pl 800 m wide], just visible in the best amateur images from Earth. The devastation would have been more localized because of the lack of an atmosphere, but the ejecta would have raked the surface for kilometers and the severe shaking would have caused downslope movement on distant crater rims and hill slopes, exposing bright material not yet darkened by solar radiation and particles. It has been [http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/features.cfm?feature=1769 estimated] that a Tunguska size event occurs on Earth about every 300 years; with the new high resolution imaging of the Moon by orbiters it will be possible to determining the cratering rate since Apollo. This will help constrain the recurrence interval for asteroid collisions for Earth.<br /> <br /> ''Chuck Wood''<br /> <br /> '''Related Links'''<br /> [http://www.psi.edu/projects/siberia/siberia.html Great overview]<br /> [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tunguska_event Wikipedia]<br /> [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EiXpp-i442s History Channel] video stressing ufo ideas as well as scientific ones<br /> <br /> '''TOMORROW: A NEW LPOD!'''<br /> <br /> | [[Image:LPOD-June30-08.jpg|LPOD-June30-08.jpg]]<br /> ''Apollo 15-8936 Panoramic Camera image from [http://www.lpi.usra.edu/lunar/documents/NASA%20SP-362.pdf Apollo Over the Moon: A View from Orbit]. This crater is about 2 km in diameter, rather than 800 m, but has a morphology very similar to a fresh crater formed by the Tunguska projectile. The smooth material on the floor is impact melt.''<br /> <br /> One hundred years ago this morning a massive explosion in the skies over Siberia flattened forests and killed thousands of bears and reindeer. There is still debate over what the projectile was, but the effects on Earth are clear. The atmospheric burst caused a pressure wave that blew over trees for a radius of about 25 kilometers, knocked people to the ground 60 km from ground zero, and created measurable tremors 1000 km away. And yet this was apparently a cosmically small projectile (about 50 m diameter) - the effects were magnified because it was an airburst. If this same projectile had hit the Moon it would have produced a simple crater [http://janus.astro.umd.edu/cgi-bin/astro/impact/impact.pl 800 m wide], just visible in the best amateur images from Earth. The devastation would have been more localized because of the lack of an atmosphere, but the ejecta would have raked the surface for kilometers and the severe shaking would have caused downslope movement on distant crater rims and hill slopes, exposing bright material not yet darkened by solar radiation and particles. It has been [http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/features.cfm?feature=1769 estimated] that a Tunguska size event occurs on Earth about every 300 years; with the new high resolution imaging of the Moon by orbiters it will be possible to determining the cratering rate since Apollo. This will help constrain the recurrence interval for asteroid collisions for Earth.<br /> <br /> ''Chuck Wood''<br /> <br /> '''Related Links'''<br /> [http://www.psi.edu/projects/siberia/siberia.html Great overview]<br /> [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tunguska_event Wikipedia]<br /> [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EiXpp-i442s History Channel] video stressing ufo ideas as well as scientific ones<br /> <br /> '''TOMORROW: A NEW LPOD!'''<br /> <br /> | ||
---- | ---- | ||
| − | '''COMMENTS'''<br /> <span style="FONT-SIZE: 80%">To [ | + | '''COMMENTS'''<br /> <span style="FONT-SIZE: 80%">To [[LPOD%20Comments|post comments]] regarding this LPOD you need to first register for the wiki by clicking the "Join this space" link under the Full Moon icon in the upper left corner of the screen, and wait for your membership to be approved. Once registered, you may still need to "Sign In" (link at top right of screen) to remove the "Protected" icon from the top of the LPOD page. Once you don't see a "Protected" icon, please click [http://the-moon.us/wiki/page/edit/LPOD+June+30,+2008 here] and enter your comment in the space below. ''Please do not edit the LPOD itself!''</span><br /> <br /> 1. See also Carl Sagan's ''COSMOS'', Chapter IV: ''Heaven and Hell'' (on the nature of comets and possible impacts on planet Earth, such as the one in Siberia 1908).<br /> --Danny C.<br /> <br /> 2. It's interesting how the rays are made of dark material and appear to favor one side over the other. I wonder if such an impact took place on the surface of the Earth would rays be visible and for how long? <span class="membersnap">- AndrewMartinSFO</span><br /> <br /> 3. Andrew - I don't think Meteor Crater retains any significant rays, but nuclear bomb testing craters from the 1960s formed rays. No one has really studied the details of the azimuthal distribution of rays - probably depends on variations in the strength of the target rocks. Meteor Crater is about 50,000 old, and that seems long enough in Earth's very active climate to disperse whatever rays may have existed.<br /> --Chuck<br /> <br /> |
---- | ---- | ||
| − | + | </div> | |
Latest revision as of 15:55, 15 April 2018
June 30, 2008
TUNGUSKA AND THE MOON
Apollo 15-8936 Panoramic Camera image from Apollo Over the Moon: A View from Orbit. This crater is about 2 km in diameter, rather than 800 m, but has a morphology very similar to a fresh crater formed by the Tunguska projectile. The smooth material on the floor is impact melt.
One hundred years ago this morning a massive explosion in the skies over Siberia flattened forests and killed thousands of bears and reindeer. There is still debate over what the projectile was, but the effects on Earth are clear. The atmospheric burst caused a pressure wave that blew over trees for a radius of about 25 kilometers, knocked people to the ground 60 km from ground zero, and created measurable tremors 1000 km away. And yet this was apparently a cosmically small projectile (about 50 m diameter) - the effects were magnified because it was an airburst. If this same projectile had hit the Moon it would have produced a simple crater 800 m wide, just visible in the best amateur images from Earth. The devastation would have been more localized because of the lack of an atmosphere, but the ejecta would have raked the surface for kilometers and the severe shaking would have caused downslope movement on distant crater rims and hill slopes, exposing bright material not yet darkened by solar radiation and particles. It has been estimated that a Tunguska size event occurs on Earth about every 300 years; with the new high resolution imaging of the Moon by orbiters it will be possible to determining the cratering rate since Apollo. This will help constrain the recurrence interval for asteroid collisions for Earth.
Chuck Wood
Related Links
Great overview
Wikipedia
History Channel video stressing ufo ideas as well as scientific ones
TOMORROW: A NEW LPOD!
COMMENTS
To post comments regarding this LPOD you need to first register for the wiki by clicking the "Join this space" link under the Full Moon icon in the upper left corner of the screen, and wait for your membership to be approved. Once registered, you may still need to "Sign In" (link at top right of screen) to remove the "Protected" icon from the top of the LPOD page. Once you don't see a "Protected" icon, please click here and enter your comment in the space below. Please do not edit the LPOD itself!
1. See also Carl Sagan's COSMOS, Chapter IV: Heaven and Hell (on the nature of comets and possible impacts on planet Earth, such as the one in Siberia 1908).
--Danny C.
2. It's interesting how the rays are made of dark material and appear to favor one side over the other. I wonder if such an impact took place on the surface of the Earth would rays be visible and for how long? - AndrewMartinSFO
3. Andrew - I don't think Meteor Crater retains any significant rays, but nuclear bomb testing craters from the 1960s formed rays. No one has really studied the details of the azimuthal distribution of rays - probably depends on variations in the strength of the target rocks. Meteor Crater is about 50,000 old, and that seems long enough in Earth's very active climate to disperse whatever rays may have existed.
--Chuck
