Difference between revisions of "Horrebow"

From The Moon
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "<div id="content_view" class="wiki" style="display: block"> =Horrebow= {| class="wiki_table" | Lat: 58.7°N, Long: 40.8°W, Diam: 24 km, Depth: 3.01 km, [/R%C3%BCkl%202 R...")
 
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
{| class="wiki_table"
 
{| class="wiki_table"
 
|
 
|
Lat: 58.7°N, Long: 40.8°W, Diam: 24 km, Depth: 3.01 km, [/R%C3%BCkl%202 Rükl: 2], [/Stratigraphy Erathostenian]<br />
+
Lat: 58.7°N, Long: 40.8°W, Diam: 24 km, Depth: 3.01 km, [[R%C3%BCkl%202|Rükl: 2]], [[Stratigraphy|Erathostenian]]<br />
 
|}
 
|}
 
<div id="toc">
 
<div id="toc">
=Table of Contents=
+
[http://www.lpod.org/coppermine/albums/userpics/Horrebow_LO-IV-152H_LTVT.JPG [[Image:Normal_Horrebow_LO-IV-152H_LTVT.JPG|external image normal_Horrebow_LO-IV-152H_LTVT.JPG]]]<br /> ''[http://lpod.org/coppermine/displayimage.php?pos=-2494 LO-IV-152H]'' '''Horrebow''' is to the lower left of center, overlapping 25-km '''Horrebow A''' in the upper right.<br /> <br />  
<div style="margin-left: 1em">[#Horrebow Horrebow]</div><div style="margin-left: 2em">[#Horrebow-Images Images]</div><div style="margin-left: 2em">[#Horrebow-Maps Maps]</div><div style="margin-left: 2em">[#Horrebow-Description Description]</div><div style="margin-left: 2em">[#Horrebow-Description: Elger Description: Elger]</div><div style="margin-left: 2em">[#Horrebow-Description: Wikipedia Description: Wikipedia]</div><div style="margin-left: 2em">[#Horrebow-Additional Information Additional Information]</div><div style="margin-left: 2em">[#Horrebow-Nomenclature Nomenclature]</div><div style="margin-left: 2em">[#Horrebow-LPOD Articles LPOD Articles]</div><div style="margin-left: 2em">[#Horrebow-Bibliography Bibliography]</div><div style="margin-left: 2em">[#Horrebow-A certain Horrebow in the Sourcebook Project (William R. Corliss) A certain Horrebow in the Sourcebook Project (William R. Corliss)]</div></div>[http://www.lpod.org/coppermine/albums/userpics/Horrebow_LO-IV-152H_LTVT.JPG [[Image:normal_Horrebow_LO-IV-152H_LTVT.JPG|external image normal_Horrebow_LO-IV-152H_LTVT.JPG]]]<br /> ''[http://lpod.org/coppermine/displayimage.php?pos=-2494 LO-IV-152H]'' '''Horrebow''' is to the lower left of center, overlapping 25-km '''Horrebow A''' in the upper right.<br /> <br />  
 
 
==Images==
 
==Images==
 
[http://www.lpod.org/coppermine/thumbnails.php?album=search&type=full&search=Horrebow LPOD Photo Gallery] [http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/lunar_orbiter/bin/srch_nam.shtml?Horrebow%7C0 Lunar Orbiter Images]<br /> <br />  
 
[http://www.lpod.org/coppermine/thumbnails.php?album=search&type=full&search=Horrebow LPOD Photo Gallery] [http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/lunar_orbiter/bin/srch_nam.shtml?Horrebow%7C0 Lunar Orbiter Images]<br /> <br />  
 
==Maps==
 
==Maps==
''([/LAC%20zone LAC zone] 11A3)'' [http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/mapcatalog/LAC/lac11/ LAC map] [http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/mapcatalog/usgs/I604/ Geologic map]<br /> <br />  
+
''([[LAC%20zone|LAC zone]] 11A3)'' [http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/mapcatalog/LAC/lac11/ LAC map] [http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/mapcatalog/usgs/I604/ Geologic map]<br /> <br />  
 
==Description==
 
==Description==
 
<br />  
 
<br />  
 
==Description: Elger==
 
==Description: Elger==
''([/IAU%20Directions IAU Directions])'' HORREBOW.--A ring-plain of remarkable shape, resembling the analemma figure, standing at the S. end of the mountain range bounding J.F.W. [/Herschel Herschel] on the E. Schmidt shows a crater on the E. wall, near the constriction on this side, and a second at the foot of the slope of the W. wall.<br /> <br />  
+
''([[IAU%20directions|IAU Directions]])'' HORREBOW.--A ring-plain of remarkable shape, resembling the analemma figure, standing at the S. end of the mountain range bounding J.F.W. [[Herschel|Herschel]] on the E. Schmidt shows a crater on the E. wall, near the constriction on this side, and a second at the foot of the slope of the W. wall.<br /> <br />  
 
==Description: Wikipedia==
 
==Description: Wikipedia==
 
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horrebow_(crater) Horrebow]<br /> <br />  
 
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horrebow_(crater) Horrebow]<br /> <br />  
 
==Additional Information==
 
==Additional Information==
  Depth data from [/Kurt%20Fisher%20crater%20depths Kurt Fisher database]<br />  
+
  Depth data from [[Kurt%20Fisher%20Crater%20Depths|Kurt Fisher database]]<br />  
 
* Westfall, 2000: 3.01 km
 
* Westfall, 2000: 3.01 km
 
* Viscardy, 1985: 2.5 km
 
* Viscardy, 1985: 2.5 km
  
* The shadows in LO-IV-152H indicate that the depth is about 2600 m. However it is less in the south and more in the north, especially around the location of the bright peak. '''Horrebow A''' is about 2000 m deep. <span class="membersnap">- [http://www.wikispaces.com/user/view/JimMosher [[Image:JimMosher-lg.jpg|16px|JimMosher]]] [http://www.wikispaces.com/user/view/JimMosher JimMosher]</span>
+
* The shadows in LO-IV-152H indicate that the depth is about 2600 m. However it is less in the south and more in the north, especially around the location of the bright peak. '''Horrebow A''' is about 2000 m deep. <span class="membersnap">- Jim Mosher</span>
 
<br />  
 
<br />  
 
==Nomenclature==
 
==Nomenclature==
 
  Peder; Danish astronomer (1679-1764).<br /> <br />  
 
  Peder; Danish astronomer (1679-1764).<br /> <br />  
 
==LPOD Articles==
 
==LPOD Articles==
[http://www.lpod.org/?m=20071009 Copernicus on the Limb]<br /> <br />  
+
[http://www2.lpod.org/wiki/October_9,_2007 Copernicus on the Limb]<br /> <br />  
 
==Bibliography==
 
==Bibliography==
 
<br />  
 
<br />  
Line 36: Line 35:
 
* Page 138: '''The Satellite of Venus''' (T.W.Webb, ''Nature'', 1876).
 
* Page 138: '''The Satellite of Venus''' (T.W.Webb, ''Nature'', 1876).
 
* Page 142: '''The Supposed Satellite of Venus''' (''Observatory'', 1887).
 
* Page 142: '''The Supposed Satellite of Venus''' (''Observatory'', 1887).
<u>Note</u>: these strange articles are from the days when a natural satellite in orbit around Venus was still seen as a possibility... (or perhaps not?). Anyway, the observing eyes of lots of professional and amateur astronomers were glued to the eyepieces of their telescopes. Perhaps a bit too much glued, because most of them didn't observe the supposed "natural" satellite (called "''Neith''"), but... rather the unexpected ghost image of the bright Venus itself, reflected between the lenses of the telescope's eyepiece! (a visual side effect created by poor optics, or...??). <span class="membersnap">- [http://www.wikispaces.com/user/view/DannyCaes [[Image:DannyCaes-lg.jpg|16px|DannyCaes]]] [http://www.wikispaces.com/user/view/DannyCaes DannyCaes] <small>Apr 19, 2015</small></span><br />  We could ask questions about telescopic observers of binary and multiple star systems. Were they really observing binary and multiple stars, or were most of them just adjacent ghost images of singular bright stars? <span class="membersnap">- [http://www.wikispaces.com/user/view/DannyCaes [[Image:DannyCaes-lg.jpg|16px|DannyCaes]]] [http://www.wikispaces.com/user/view/DannyCaes DannyCaes] <small>Apr 19, 2015</small></span><br />
+
<u>Note</u>: these strange articles are from the days when a natural satellite in orbit around Venus was still seen as a possibility... (or perhaps not?). Anyway, the observing eyes of lots of professional and amateur astronomers were glued to the eyepieces of their telescopes. Perhaps a bit too much glued, because most of them didn't observe the supposed "natural" satellite (called "''Neith''"), but... rather the unexpected ghost image of the bright Venus itself, reflected between the lenses of the telescope's eyepiece! (a visual side effect created by poor optics, or...??). <span class="membersnap">- DannyCaes <small>Apr 19, 2015</small></span><br />  We could ask questions about telescopic observers of binary and multiple star systems. Were they really observing binary and multiple stars, or were most of them just adjacent ghost images of singular bright stars? <span class="membersnap">- DannyCaes <small>Apr 19, 2015</small></span><br />
 
----
 
----
  This page has been edited 1 times. The last modification was made by <span class="membersnap">- [http://www.wikispaces.com/user/view/tychocrater [[Image:tychocrater-lg.jpg|16px|tychocrater]]] [http://www.wikispaces.com/user/view/tychocrater tychocrater]</span> on Jun 13, 2009 3:24 pm - ''afx3u2''</div>
+
  </div>

Latest revision as of 01:53, 16 April 2018

Horrebow

Lat: 58.7°N, Long: 40.8°W, Diam: 24 km, Depth: 3.01 km, Rükl: 2, Erathostenian

external image normal_Horrebow_LO-IV-152H_LTVT.JPG
LO-IV-152H Horrebow is to the lower left of center, overlapping 25-km Horrebow A in the upper right.

Images

LPOD Photo Gallery Lunar Orbiter Images

Maps

(LAC zone 11A3) LAC map Geologic map

Description


Description: Elger

(IAU Directions) HORREBOW.--A ring-plain of remarkable shape, resembling the analemma figure, standing at the S. end of the mountain range bounding J.F.W. Herschel on the E. Schmidt shows a crater on the E. wall, near the constriction on this side, and a second at the foot of the slope of the W. wall.

Description: Wikipedia

Horrebow

Additional Information

Depth data from Kurt Fisher database
  • Westfall, 2000: 3.01 km
  • Viscardy, 1985: 2.5 km
  • The shadows in LO-IV-152H indicate that the depth is about 2600 m. However it is less in the south and more in the north, especially around the location of the bright peak. Horrebow A is about 2000 m deep. - Jim Mosher


Nomenclature

Peder; Danish astronomer (1679-1764).

LPOD Articles

Copernicus on the Limb

Bibliography


A certain Horrebow in the Sourcebook Project (William R. Corliss)

(articles in which the name Horrebow is mentioned) (probably Peder Horrebow)
- In Mysterious Universe, a handbook of astronomical anomalies (1979) :
  • Page 138: The Satellite of Venus (T.W.Webb, Nature, 1876).
  • Page 142: The Supposed Satellite of Venus (Observatory, 1887).

Note: these strange articles are from the days when a natural satellite in orbit around Venus was still seen as a possibility... (or perhaps not?). Anyway, the observing eyes of lots of professional and amateur astronomers were glued to the eyepieces of their telescopes. Perhaps a bit too much glued, because most of them didn't observe the supposed "natural" satellite (called "Neith"), but... rather the unexpected ghost image of the bright Venus itself, reflected between the lenses of the telescope's eyepiece! (a visual side effect created by poor optics, or...??). - DannyCaes Apr 19, 2015
We could ask questions about telescopic observers of binary and multiple star systems. Were they really observing binary and multiple stars, or were most of them just adjacent ghost images of singular bright stars? - DannyCaes Apr 19, 2015